I was using input shaper, mzv at 54Hz. I just did another test with input shaper turned off, and I still see the gap between PA undercompensating and overcompensating. It may be due to the fact that the test acceleration is much below the input shaper smoothing limit. I have not done a side-by-side comparison with shaper turned on and off for the same PA. My current test with a PETG filament on direct drive shows best result at 0.082 and smooth_time 0.02
I see, I misunderstood how scv works. I need to look at it in more detail.