When I printed in spiral mode, Although the flow rate is constant, the movement amount of the Z axis is uneven.
As a result, the width of the print changes periodically.
For me this looks like a mechanical issue with your Z axis as it is nicely periodical. Most likely the axis is binding or has extreme wobble.
I do not know the Tronxy printer but also your Z axis speed seems a bit optimistic for a lead screw:
I tried max_z_verocity=8. but not good.
but you gave me good hint.
max_z_accel =30 seems too small.
now I am trying “100” , and better than used to.
Thank you .
There is definitively something going on with your Z-axis. 100 is much too fast for a lead screw. You should mechanically check this axis.
You could try a higher accel but really lower speed. Something along: max_z_accel: 120
With removed lead-screws make sure the bed moves freely on the linear guides without binding or bumping (these linear guides and rods often are really crappy)
If it does not move completely freely, then try to align the rods. With 4 rods the alignment must be pretty perfect to avoid binding
Install the lead-screws and make sure to align them perfectly perpendicular to your bed. Avoid any skew
Thanks for Links.
I’ll purchase one of them.
X5SA Pro has two independent Z-axis.
but the stock do not have the belt.
It’s optional parts.(but it’s quite necessary)
I do not know this printer and I thus do not know why it is necessary but from a mechanical point this looks like a very bad idea:
The belt has a certain tension thus trying to pull the lead-screw inwards
To compensate for alignment errors the lead-screw has this flexible couplings (which makes sense)
As a result you will inevitable get a skew on the lead-screw especially on the upper end as it is a quite long lead-screw
If you want to do something like this, it would IMO absolutely need some bearing that takes the force of the belt tension. Actually I would not be surprised if parts of your problem comes from this.
And an Oldham coupling would also not work in such a setup.
Hi Sineos-san
The belt is useless for in printing.
It’s not tight and not too loose.
It has the effect of preventing slippage when not printing or push the bed unintentiaonally.
(I’m not good at English.May be not correct)
by the way
I purchesed flex coupling.
I can’t wait to arrive.
It does not really matter why the belt is there. The way it is attached will lead to problems and it will not get better with a new coupling. If you want to solve these print artifacts then you will need to:
Improve the mechanical alignment of your rods and make sure that the bedrun freely
Improve the mechanical alignment of your leadscrew and make sure there are no forces skewing this lead-screw
This image shows a similar setup but done right: The leadscrew has a bearing on the bottom and one above the pulley. The forces of the belt cannot skew the leadscrew. This is the only really correct setup
Move the pulley down to the axis of the stepper. Then the stepper axis will take the load, which is not ideal but much better than having the load above the flexible coupling. Of course you will need new pulleys with the right dimension.
I made sense your opnion.
First pic looks very strong !
It’s difficult to move the pulley down.
I’ll check what happens when the pulley is removed.
You can try, boyon-san. In doubt I would wait until you can modify both, saves you some work.
When you do this modification, I strongly encourage you to really check the alignment of both the lead-screws and the linear bushings. Especially the bushings have a high chance of binding if not aligned perfectly and this will almost surely heavily affect the print quality.
You can only check the quality of the bushing alignment when the lead-screws are removed.