Can we please merge the PID calibrate improvements already 😭

The main question here is “Does it affect your printing?”

I’m never against improvements, but they have to be kept in perspective of the ultimate goal you’re trying to achieve here.

Otherwise you’re just “chasing zeros” for accuracy with diminishing returns.

Case in point, Hotend temps.

Ultimate goal: Melt a thermoplastic past it’s glass transition temp to extrude it.

Glass transition temp isn’t a sharp cut off point, It’s a smooth curve.

If you look up a glass transition temp, It’s just giving you the glass transition POINT (where the region begins) and it always says “Approx x degrees” or “~x degrees” because there is wiggle room and then past that point you’re within the transition region for a relatively wide band of temperatures.

but still seeing ~0.4 deg fluctuations

That’s an outstanding level of control. The ultra highest accuracy PID controllers used in labs and metrology only claim .1% accuracy

At 230c that would be 230 * .001 = .23 c fluctuation, you’re double that but still, you’re better than most industrial controls tuned by professionals that get paid to do it with the best equipment.

it’s 1-2 deg fluctuations all the time.

Nature of the beast, you tuned for one temp, if you go outside that range you will get variance. 2 degree fluctuation at 230c is .8% (Edit: It’s .87%, or closer to .9% since we’re chasing accuracy here :nerd_face:) , less than a 1% variance. That’s pretty awesome and well within glass transition temp.

If you were fluctuating 20 degrees or so, that’d be a MUCH bigger issue.

All in all, Your PID is doing it’s job and is on par with some of the best out there.

Again, It all comes down to… “How is it affecting my printing?”